Gail Anderson-Dargatz

Resources for writers

Gail Anderson-Dargatz

Resources for writers

Explore Our Resources for Writers

Building Blocks

Big Idea

Your Characters

Point of View

Situation

Structure

Revising

Publishing

Making a Living

Life

Point of view (POV) is the eye or camera lens through which the reader views the story. For a writer, choosing what point of view is right for your project can be difficult. Maintaining it can be even harder. And if you find you have to change the point of view of your story half-way in, you have to change everything. Changing POV means a full rewrite. So, you really want to give it some careful thought from the start.

Broadly, your choices when it comes to point of view are:

First person: I flew off in a spacecraft.
Second person: You flew off in a spacecraft.
Third person: She flew off in a spacecraft.

Head SwapingWe’ll look at each point of view in more depth below. But first, let’s talk a little about the importance of choosing the right POV for your project from the start.

I originally wrote my literary novel A Recipe for Bees from the character Rose's point of view. But another character, Augusta, was my protagonist; the story was about her. Rose was her friend who had a limited view into Augusta’s life. And yet I had chosen to write the story from Rose’s POV. While you don’t necessarily have to follow the protagonist’s POV to tell a story, Rose couldn’t offer the depth of perspective that Augusta, who had lived the events, could. So, Rose wasn’t a great choice as a POV character. What was I thinking? Predictably my editor pointed out the problem. My immediate feeling was exhaustion. Again, a change in point of view changes everything in a project, so what I was facing was a complete rewrite of the novel. But my editor was right. I had kept the reader at arm’s length from the action of the novel by writing Augusta's story from Rose's point of view. Ugh. So, I got to work and rewrote the novel from top to bottom from Augusta's point of view. Believe it or not, I got that next draft written in about six weeks. The book went on to be a finalist for the Giller Prize, and I'm still proud of that book, but geeze I wished I'd started writing the darn thing from Augusta's point of view in the first place.



So, the moral of the story? Choose your point of view and POV narrator carefully. In my case, the novel really was about Augusta, so it needed to be told from her perspective. This could have been accomplished either through a first or third person narrative. I chose the third person limited POV, which follows the actions, thoughts and feelings of just one character, as opposed to omniscient (or all-knowing), which follows the actions, thoughts and feelings of many characters within the story.

Sometimes choosing POV is confusing (or we make it confusing!), as in my example above. Other times it’s an easy choice. For example, in my novel Iggy’s World, the story is about Iggy, a guy who loves bugs and wants to be accepted for who he is. It made sense to tell the story from his point of view as, obviously, it's his story. It’s also a middle school novel, which are largely, but not always, written in first person. And the novel is all about Iggy’s podcast. So, I chose a first person POV for that novel, viewing the world from inside his head as he records events from his own life for his podcast.

Deciding on your narrator's point of view is often a matter of experimentation. Very early in a project, I'll take a passage written in one point of view and try it in another, to see which works better for my story, as in my examples below. And, as in the case of my novel, A Recipe for Bees, it might be necessary to write the whole project from one point of view and then change it to another. For example, if you're writing a story about an event that happened to you personally, it may be necessary to write the initial drafts in the third person, to gain some distance from the material and allow it to transform into fiction. Once you've done that, you may want to rewrite it as first person to achieve the effect you're after.

Again, simplified, your choices when it comes to point of view are:

First person: I flew off in a spacecraft.
Second person: You flew off in a spacecraft.
Third person: She flew off in a spacecraft.


First Person:

First person is cool because we get right under the skin of the character, seeing and feeling what they experience, almost first-hand. Writers often say that first person gives their story "immediacy," meaning we're right there inside the protagonist. We identify with the first person POV closely. A lot, if not most young adult (YA) novels are written in the first person. Chances are your project will be too as most apprentice writers begin their careers working in first person. It's generally easier for newbie writers to understand and use.

First person has some downsides, though. It can lead to the overuse of interior monologue and exposition as, again, we're inside the protagonist's head and they are telling us about what they are going through. In other words, there is a tendency with first person to fall into the trap of telling, rather than showing. First person narratives can also suffer from "I, I, I" syndrome, where the narrative is littered with "I did this," and "I felt that," leaving the reader thinking the narrating protectonist is all about "me, me, me." You know that friend of yours who only posts selfies? Yeah, that. As the link below points out, the trick here is to get rid of the overuse of "I" through word choice, and to focus on what's happening outside the protagonist's head. But, of course, getting the protagonist's thoughts first-hand is one of the appeals of the first person POV.

Here's an example of first person POV from the opening of my middle school novel Iggy's World:

Testing, testing. One, two, three. Is the mic on my phone working? Check, check. I'll have to keep my voice down. My dad's filming a show right now. I'm recording this podcast just off the set.
     Here we go! Welcome to Iggy's World.
     Hi! I'm your host, Iggy Zambini, and you're listening to episode one of Iggy's World, a podcast about insects. I know, I know. Insects make your skin crawl. But don't tune out yet. This podcast isn't just about bugs. For example, today I'm recording this from the set of the sci-fi web series Great Big Bugs in Space. Because, you know, the show is about great big bugs in space.


Second Person:

Most apprentice writers take a stab at second person somewhere along the road. I have. It can make for some interesting effects on the page.

But working with second person is troublesome because at best it can sound like stage directions (“you take three steps across the room”) and at worst like orders (“You jump off the bridge”). Your reader will not want to be told what to do (especially if it’s to jump off a bridge!). If it’s clear that the story is about someone else, say, a younger self, or in the case of a story I wrote, my mother (so "I" was putting myself in the shoes of "my mother") then you can pull it off. But it’s very hard to sustain for long and I don't recommend it for a novel project. Second person often annoys the reader and that's always a bad idea. But it's always worth experimenting. Play!

Here's that example from Iggy's World rewritten in the second person:

Testing, testing. One, two, three. Is the mic on your phone working? Check, check. You'll have to keep your voice down. Your dad's filming a show right now. You're recording this podcast just off the set.
     Here you go! Say it: Welcome to Iggy's World.
     You're the host, Iggy Zambini, and somebody out there, somewhere, is listening to episode one of Iggy's World, your podcast about insects. You know insects make people's skin crawl. But you tell them: don't tune out yet. This podcast isn't just about bugs. For example, today you're recording this from the set of the sci-fi web series Great Big Bugs in Space. Because, of course, the show is about great big bugs in space.

Hmm. I don't think I like that. It changes the tone, doesn't it? Makes it sort of ... sad, or something. Given my project is about a kid recording a podcast about his life, the second person doesn't fit at all.



Third Person:

Third person POV can be the all-knowing viewpoint that gets into the minds of all the characters (frequently used in the past; less used today). That's third person omniscient.

Or third person POV can see the world from just one character's perspective (more used today). That's third person limited.

Either way, the narrative perspective is a bit distanced. It's like the viewpoint is watching events over the shoulder of the character. Here's a section of that example from my middle school novel Iggy's World rewritten in third person limited:

Iggy tested the mike. "One, two, three." Is the mic on the phone working, he wondered? "Check, check." He would have to keep his voice down as his Dad was filming a show right then. Iggy was recording his podcast just off the set.
     "Here we go!" said Iggy, into his phone mic. "Welcome to Iggy's World. I'm your host, Iggy Zambini, and you're listening to epidode one of Iggy's World.

You'll see in this example that, just as you can in first person and second person, you can still listen in to the character's thoughts. It's just that the point of view is standing back a little. To keep Iggy's voice, I used dialogue. That's because the third person POV voice is different from the character's voice.

Third person wasn't right for Iggy's World  because Iggy was recording his story, as it happened, as a podcast. So first person was a much better fit. But I still find third person limited the most versitile point of view and used it in my literary novel The Spawning Grounds, largely because that novel was a multiple POV project. Third person allows for seemless jumps from one character's POV to another. And third person offers that outside perspective which in many ways gives us a deeper understanding of character. Think of it this way: in real life, we often have a clearer perspective on others than we do about ourselves. In the same way, third person allows the reader to step back and view the character with a bit of detachment, to see what they are really about, from the outside. With first person, we're often limited to what the character is willing to reveal, or admit, about themselves.


Third person also gives the writer more freedom to choose the style and tone of the prose as we aren't limited to the character's voice as we are in first person, where the character is telling their own story. In short, the prose can be a whole lot prettier than how the character talks. And when it comes to process, third person is especially useful when an author writes from personal material; it gives the writer the necessary distance to transform that story into fiction.

On the downside, that narrative distance means we don't get the up-close-and-personal experience of first person. And, of course, third person can lead to the head-hopping problem you'll see discussed in lesson two of this unit. Even when using third person limited, following just one character, it's easy to accidently drift into another POV when using third person.

You don’t have to stick to one point of view to write a novel or short story. You can write from two or more points of view. Sometimes that means alternating point of view chapters, where we get character A’s POV in one chapter, then character B’s POV, back to character A and so on. Other times we can write more than one point of view within the same chapter. Either way, writing a multiple POV narrative is tricky and takes a lot of skill, but you can learn how to do it, especially if you take the time to study multiple-POV stories by other authors.

When working with any kind of multiple POV narrative, transitions are so very important. You really need to make it clear to the reader that you’re switching to a new point of view. A common problem when shifting POV is head-hopping, where we jump from one character’s head to another within the same scene or even within the same paragraph. As the link below suggests, head-hopping is one of the most common problems writers face. So, even in a multiple POV narrative, you want to focus on just one POV at a time.

My approach in The Spawning Grounds, for example, was to stick to one point of view per chapter, for the most part. When I had two points of view within the same chapter, I sometimes indicated the change in point of view with a space and then made it clear which POV we were now following.

Example really is the best teacher. Look at the books on your bookshelf and you’ll likely find multiple POV narratives there. Read carefully to see how the author accomplished the transitions between points of view.

Testimonials

Christine Fischer Guy

"Gail’s model suited me right down to the ground, exactly the right combination of close reading, thoughtful feedback, and enough space to work these questions through in my own time. She’s an intelligent and experienced manuscript midwife with an uncanny ability to see to the heart of what I was trying to do. I appreciate her guidance immensely!"

-- Christine Fischer Guy author of The Umbrella Mender (2014) and The Instrument Must Not Matter (2026).

Christine Fischer Guy

Tara Gereaux

"Gail is an incredible editor. She has an innate ability to understand what I’m trying to do with my writing and to help me see what I need to do to get where I want. The best part about working with her is her supportive, encouraging approach. She’s a writer, she gets it – she knows how hard writing can be – but when I’m working with Gail, it always feels a little bit easier and a little more fun. Can’t recommend her highly enough."

-- Tara Gereaux has published two books of fiction and was the recipient of the Colleen Bailey Memorial Award from the Saskatchewan Foundation for the Arts, and a REVEAL Indigenous Art Award from the Hnatyshyn Foundation.

Tara Gereaux

Matthew Hooton

"Gail's developmental edits were superb. Her attention to the manuscript's structure, to themes and emotional resonances, and to the character creation were at once challenging, sophisticated and encouraging. And she draws on a range of excellent resources. I've not seen anything quite like it in twenty-five years in the industry."

-- Dr. Matthew Hooton, author of Deloume Road, Typhoon Kingdom, and Everything Lost, Everything Found, longlisted for the ARA Historical Novel Prize 2025. Dr. Hooton is a lecturer at the University of Adelaide.

Matthew Hooton

Jessica Waite

"Gail is the total package: brilliant writer, keen-eyed editor, ace story architect, and warm genuine human. The structural foundation she taught saved me years of floundering in the dark. Thank you Gail!"

-- Jessica Waite, author of the Widow's Guide to Dead Bastards,  one of The Globe and Mail's best 100 books of 2024.

Jessica Waite

Darcy Friesen Hossack

"By the end of the first draft, I'd rediscovered colour in a world that had faded to black and white. I can not thank Gail enough."

-- Darcy Friesen Hossack, Danuta Gleed runner-up and Commonwealth Prize-shortlisted author of Mennonites Don't Dance  and Stillwater.

Darcy Friesen Hossack

Kelly S. Thompson

"Not only did Gail help me to polish my prose, but she also showed my how to believe in my own work, how to play, how to explore language with the writer's tools. What a gift, to have someone champion your work in a way that makes you, the writer, feel seen."

-- Kelly S. Thompson, national bestselling author of Girls Need Not Apply: Field Notes from the Forces.

Kelly S. Thompson

Lise Mayne

"Time Enough became the novel I longed to create thanks to Gail’s expert advice and encouragement. Gail helps writers find the heart of their own story, the mark of the very best teachers. I highly recommend her as a professional mentor and a sincere guide."

-- Lise Mayne, author of Time Enough.

Lise Mayne

Elle Wild

"Gails fiction course was the best class I have ever taken. Full stop. Her notes and analysis were invaluable and I still use the creative exercises she shared with us."

-- Elle Wild. #1 bestselling author of Strange Things Done and winner of the Arthur Ellis Award for Best Unpublished First Crime Novel.

Elle Wild

Maia Caron

"Perhaps there's no greater proof of a manuscript editor's work than when the writer they mentor gets a publishing contract, but what I found most valuable was applying Gail's insightful comments when I began to plot a new book."

-- Maia Caron, author of Song of Batoche

Maia Caron

Daniel Griffin

"Gail has been a great help to me for many years, reading my novels and stories and providing practical, clear and meaningful feedback. Her focus on the structure of a story, its arc, the conflict that drives it and the development of characters and their transformation has been invaluable."

-- Daniel Griffin is the author of Stopping for Strangers and Two Roads Home.

Daniel Griffin

Leila Marshy

"I've been writing my whole life, but in the past two years I can say that Gail has pretty much taught me everything I now know. I am convinced that without Gail's ministrations, my novel The Philistine would not be enjoying its current success"

-- Leila Marshy, author of The Philistine.

Leila Marshy

Nerys Parry

"(Gail's) greatest gift is her passion. She truly loves the craft and throws her heart into her work as not only a teacher but also as a coach and inspiration to aspiring writers. She always knows just how far to push you without breaking you, and if you let her, she can help you become a far better writer than you ever imagined..."

-- Nerys Parry, author of Man & Other Natural Disasters, a finalist for the Colophon Prize and tied for seventh in the Giller Prize Reader’s Choice Awards.

Nerys Parry

Jennifer Manuel

"Gail has a firm grasp on what effective mentorship looks like: supportive, challenging, fully engaged. Immediately Gail got to the heart of my novel’s problem and then worked with me to find possible solutions, pushing my craft to a higher level and deepening my understanding of narrative structure. It was nothing short of a shattering breakthrough.”

-- Jennifer Manuel, author of The Heaviness of Things That Float

Jennifer Manuel

Liisa Kovala

"Working with Gail during an early stage of my historical fiction manuscript was like taking a masterclass. Both my novel and my skills as a writer improved through her guidance. Best of all, Gail is not only knowledgeable about everything to do with writing, she is also delightful to work with."

-- Liisa Kovala, author of Surviving Stutthof: My Father's Memories Behind the Death Gate and Sisu's Winter War.

Liisa Kovala

Emily De Angelis

"Gail was knowledgeable, thoughtful, and kind as she coached me through the process. Her feedback validated my journey and help me to move forward with my story in countless meaningful ways..."

-- Emily De Angelis, author of The Stones of Burren Bay.

Emily De Angelis

Maggi Feehan

"Gail is nothing short of an editing genius. She has the rare ability to give feedback laced with compassion, appreciation and respect... that will inspire you to go back to the page and transform your narrative, words and characters in truly remarkable ways."

-- Maggi Feehan, author of The Serpent's Veil

Maggi Feehan

Kimmy Beach

"I'm so happy I chose Gail as my first foray into the world of hiring an outside eye. I've loved her work for ages, and hoped her insight would take my new project where it needed to go. I'm overwhelmed with gratitude (and work!). Thank you, Gail. You 'get' me."

-- Kimmy Beach, author of The Last Temptation of Bond.

Kimmy Beach

Chris Tarry

"Working with Gail has become the measure by which I rate every workshop I've taken, or will ever take. And she has set the bar impossibly high. To study with Gail is to understand the plight of the Apprentice Writer, to take solace in her direction, and to witness one's growth in virtually real time."

-- Chris Tarry, four-time Juno Award winner and author of How to Carry a Bigfoot Home.

Chris Tarry